Recent decisions of Judge Susan R Bolton have been problematic for people affected by Joe Arpaio. The decision last month by the prominent district judge to provide a pardon to Joe Arpaio has been met with a significant amount of disdain in the public.
He was convicted previously for racial profiling as well as other harmful activities. The decision for this Maricopa County sheriff to be imprisoned was overturned as he was granted the pardon.
Some of the problems that Lacey and Larkin have mentioned with this decision have to do with the great amount of human life that was lost. Arpaio had been notorious for inhumane prison conditions that led to the death of many of his victims.
He illegally had detained numerous individuals who were migrants or thought to be in the US without the appropriate documentation. His mistreatment as well as the illegal nature of his imprisonment centers have contributed significantly to the present outcomes.
A lot of people have been dismayed by the decision to pardon his eighty seven year old. He had a long standing reputation as being one of the worst sheriffs in the state of Arizona.
The numerous deaths that have not been documented or reported are just some of the cruelties that were committed by Arpaio. There were substantial captives that were also targeted by a special task force that Arpaio created for the sole purpose of fulfilling his ulterior motives.
Since there are so many harmful circumstances propagated by Arpaio it was surprising that he did not have to face the consequences of his actions. The pardon was initiated by the president, who had gained a lot of support from Arpaio in earlier years. Read more: Michael Lacey | Crunchbase and Phoenix New Times | Wikipedia
He had been an influential supporter for Trump prior to the election process. This suggests that there is a long standing relationship between the two that may have contributed to the development of reform in multiple areas.
Overall, Lacey and Larkin have been very vocal about the grave nature of his actions. They command that further efforts should be made for the establishment of a better precedence when it comes to harmful misuse of power. They have advocated for better civil liberties for many years as the adversity poised by Joe Arpaio has spanned multiple generations.
There are a lot of ways that the Frontera Fund is concerned with Joe Arpaio. This is due to the complex nature of the way that he targets migrants and immigrants. After being held hostage by his task force, Lacey and Larkin won a significant law suit based on persecution of the first amendment.
It is notable that their present position both legally and in other aspects of development is based on an understanding of Arpaio as well as a perspective about his actions being unfair. He has even held pregnant women captive and chained to unsafe and unclean birthing rooms.
While there have been numerous allegations against him, these have been dismissed based on the work of the recent pardon.
Learn more about Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey: